Tuesday, January 4, 2011

From What Ideology Will the Fourth Reich Arise?

(Recovered after deleted by hacker by copying it from a cache)

I have often heard vain babbling based on nothing but speculation, concerning this topic. Many who will call themselves National Socialists will wish for a reinstitution of Heinrich Himmler’s occult ideology. Even worse, I see many calling for the reinstitution of his racial ideology.

In the end, did either even have a place in the mind of Adolf Hitler? As far as the view on religion is concerned, I believe that the following should at least be enough to get people to think:



I do not support all of the views of the individual who created the video, but the video itself is without flaw concerning the issue.

The racial ideology is something which I find even more puzzling to see modern “Neo-Nazis” partake in. They are indeed just that NEO-Nazis. It is apparent that they are revisionists as far as the ideology of actual socialism is concerned. When one realizes that it was not Hitler himself who was mainly to blame for such a thing, it challenges an entire portion of what you have been told about the man.

Perhaps the following will be enough to get you to think on the issue:



Still the question, “What if anything will compose the Fourth Reich?”, presents itself as a difficulty. Sure we have lightly touched the issue concerning Hitler’s view on religion, and race. However, we have not touched the features of the State or the economic system.

Hitler and Stalin both agreed, placing industry under the control of the State was essential. One could pick at this all day long and state that there was still private ownership of such things in Germany. Ultimately, one question needs to be asked. Was there private CONTROL over the industries in Germany? The answer to anyone who is educated concerning the matter will be an obvious “No”. The amount of goods produced and when was determined by the State. Also, the amount of money obtained by the “owners” of the industries was determined by the State.
To any honest individual, it is a weak argument at best to state that there was private ownership of these things within the Third Reich.

What then is the difference between Marxist Socialism and National Socialism?

Karl Marx described an international system, while National Socialism was Nationalist! Who would have thought that the name actually means what it says? Anyone who wishes to state that classes would have remained should skip to 2:50 in the following, and see what Hitler said for yourself:



There are many other speeches in which he spoke of there being a future of no classes within society. This does not exactly mean that everyone would have equal power. However, all would be viewed equal as far as opportunity is concerned. All would have the same rights to Health-care, a reasonable wage to support their family, and so on and so forth.

While Mussolini’s Nationalism was good, his economic system was left lacking. It was the last line of corrupt Capitalism taking its root in Italy. Comparing Hitlerism to Fascism is a Neo-Liberal tactic, so that he can be distanced from the Left portion of the political spectrum.

We are not proclaiming an Internationalism. We are however proclaiming a Socialism within one country. This was the same system that Stalin and Mao had in mind. It is also the same that the DPRK (North Korea) has in place currently. When you see Nationalism promoted in a system being called Socialist, it is generally a good indicator that the system is genuine. We have seen how these countries in the past have lashed out against the Jew World Order, and supported heartfelt Nationalism for their country. They stressed independence for their country as far as is possible.

Rather than bankrupting ourselves by giving the rights of this system to illegal immigrants, and seeking to be absorbed into an international community, we want the benefits of the system to belong to citizens of the country alone. No racial exclusion will be involved. What will be involved is National/Cultural exclusion.

Oh, only if the National Bolshevik party currently in Russia would give up its racial views! They would be spot on with our points. If only people would realize that the same system was promoted by Hitler, Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Mao, Pol Pot, and many others! Maybe then we would have common sense used in which type of system should be utilized.

It is unfathomable to see mindless Christians and Odinists act like they follow the lead of Adolf the Great. As was seen in the video earlier, he neither supported Christianity or a return to the worship of Wotan (Odin). I will grant that we should not force people to give up the beliefs that they have. Judaism, however, will not be tolerated either in its esoteric or exoteric forms by the State. What I mean by that is that we will not support it being practiced spiritually, or in its economic/political form in the State. We have seen how it corrodes society too many times. It will not be tolerated in the Fourth Reich for any reason.

Nothing that seeks to undermine the power of the State will be allowed. Such things will be stomped underneath our boots. It is worth saying that Christianity will die a natural death one day. After science has disproven all points of Christianity, it will be done away with by default. People will no longer see it to be useful.

The Staate will always remain secular. There will be no tinge of spirituality that runs the affairs of the State. The Odinists, JOSers and many others will disagree. We are not interested in these racialist groups anyway. Such will be done away with by the Nationalist Socialist revolution in America.

This is a call to all to study the writings of Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, Adolf Hitler, Mao, and the others. This is a call to those who will support our cause to step up. I know that our numbers do not appear too pleasing to the eye. Remember that each revolutionary movement in the past started with only a few members. It then swelled into a giant that could not be put to sleep during the time.

Will you be a true revolutionary, or an armchair rebel?

No comments:

Post a Comment