Tuesday, January 4, 2011
The Aryanism Website
There are many nuggets of wisdom to find at http://aryanism.net
It shows us that Aryanism is the most noble teachings that all Gentiles have wedged somewhere within their cultures. It is not a racial ideology, which is why I like the site. The site expresses many things of value.
The errors that I see are probably honest mistakes. They tried to make Fascism out to not be a National Socialist ideology. We have to be honest and see that many of Hitler's ideas came from Benito Mussolini.
Although the systems were not exactly the same, I would dare to say that the political platforms of both would lead to the same type of society evolving out of them.
However, I will not divide with others who are honestly confused.
One other problem I found are occasional quotes from people such as George Lincoln Rockwell and Savitri Devi who were staunch racialists. I can understand the quoting of them to an extent though, because the quotes given are generally relevant to the articles. I just wish that they would say something like, "They put such and such in a good way, but we do not agree with their ideology". Then I would have no ability to make a sincere complaint about it.
Please check out http://aryanism.net despite some of the set backs. There is good wisdom to be found there in many places on the website.
**The World National Socialist Alliance as a general rule does not advocate ALL material on a suggested website. Websites will be pointed to if they have any relevance at all on particular points of the website. Do not send complaints with the assumption that the entirety of a website is being promoted. All genuine comments and concerns can be sent to new.vinland@gmail.com**
It shows us that Aryanism is the most noble teachings that all Gentiles have wedged somewhere within their cultures. It is not a racial ideology, which is why I like the site. The site expresses many things of value.
The errors that I see are probably honest mistakes. They tried to make Fascism out to not be a National Socialist ideology. We have to be honest and see that many of Hitler's ideas came from Benito Mussolini.
Although the systems were not exactly the same, I would dare to say that the political platforms of both would lead to the same type of society evolving out of them.
However, I will not divide with others who are honestly confused.
One other problem I found are occasional quotes from people such as George Lincoln Rockwell and Savitri Devi who were staunch racialists. I can understand the quoting of them to an extent though, because the quotes given are generally relevant to the articles. I just wish that they would say something like, "They put such and such in a good way, but we do not agree with their ideology". Then I would have no ability to make a sincere complaint about it.
Please check out http://aryanism.net despite some of the set backs. There is good wisdom to be found there in many places on the website.
**The World National Socialist Alliance as a general rule does not advocate ALL material on a suggested website. Websites will be pointed to if they have any relevance at all on particular points of the website. Do not send complaints with the assumption that the entirety of a website is being promoted. All genuine comments and concerns can be sent to new.vinland@gmail.com**
Adolf Hitler’s Armed Forces: A Triumph for Diversity?
Since the site forbids me from reproducing the article here, I will only give it a short introduction and then provide the link to the material.
Veronica Clark (author of Black Nazis!) wrote this article for inconvenienthistory.com
People are ignorant that the SS was a very multicultural Army. It was the most multicultural in the world at the time. Yet, people call Hitler a racist all the time. I ask for people to only research for yourself.
It was the work of Heinrich Himmler that resulted in racial policies in the Third Reich. Without further delay, I give you the link to the article.
http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_3/adolf_hitlers_armed_forces.php
Veronica Clark (author of Black Nazis!) wrote this article for inconvenienthistory.com
People are ignorant that the SS was a very multicultural Army. It was the most multicultural in the world at the time. Yet, people call Hitler a racist all the time. I ask for people to only research for yourself.
It was the work of Heinrich Himmler that resulted in racial policies in the Third Reich. Without further delay, I give you the link to the article.
http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_3/adolf_hitlers_armed_forces.php
Stalin Revision
(retrieved from cache)
I truly believe that Stalin was trying to make Russia nationalist rather than internationalist. There are many things that he did which we can disagree with, but it is apparent that especially toward the end of his life, he grew a strong hatred for Jews.
He saw them as nothing but spies who damaged the country.
There is some text from a video that I wrote down to quote here. I refuse to give the link to the video due to some very incorrect statements in it, and very Anti-Nationalist stupidity.
However, even from the most ridiculous people, some truth comes forward. I wish to quote from the text in the video to show Stalin in a more positive light:
"Stalin was not a mass killer
The borders of Ukraine were not even the same in 1926 and 1939.
The Kuban Cossaks, between 2 and 3 million people, were registered
as Ukranian in 1926, but were reclassified as Russian by the end of the
twenties.
This new classification explains by itself 25 to 40 percent of the 'victims
of the famine-genocide' calculated by Dudhnyck--Mace.
During the years 1930--1935, the Soviet Union was short of labor,
especially in newly developed regions. The regime tried to use all
available forces. It is difficult to see why it would have 'killed' men who
had been working the land.
Nevertheless, estimates state that the 100,000 heads of family of the
first category, sent to the Gulag system, had been killed.
But the Party only placed 63,000 kulaks in the first category, and only
those guilty of terrorist and counter-revolutionary acts were executed!
The 100,000 stat was a lie.
Under the NEP, Kulaks and other private producers controlled over half
of the food supply (mainly wheat). The Kulaks didn't cooperate with the
state. The Kulaks even raised prices.
Therefore, Kulaks were responsible for the Holodomor. However, the deaths
of it are *exaggerated* and blamed on Stalin by Stalin's opponents. Only a
few thousand actually died, and their deaths were the Kulaks' fault.
Stalin ended the Ukranian famines with his collectivization of the agriculture."
These facts can be independently verified. I am always trying to encourage people to do their own research, and this is an issue that I will entrust you to do just that.
I truly believe that Stalin was trying to make Russia nationalist rather than internationalist. There are many things that he did which we can disagree with, but it is apparent that especially toward the end of his life, he grew a strong hatred for Jews.
He saw them as nothing but spies who damaged the country.
There is some text from a video that I wrote down to quote here. I refuse to give the link to the video due to some very incorrect statements in it, and very Anti-Nationalist stupidity.
However, even from the most ridiculous people, some truth comes forward. I wish to quote from the text in the video to show Stalin in a more positive light:
"Stalin was not a mass killer
The borders of Ukraine were not even the same in 1926 and 1939.
The Kuban Cossaks, between 2 and 3 million people, were registered
as Ukranian in 1926, but were reclassified as Russian by the end of the
twenties.
This new classification explains by itself 25 to 40 percent of the 'victims
of the famine-genocide' calculated by Dudhnyck--Mace.
During the years 1930--1935, the Soviet Union was short of labor,
especially in newly developed regions. The regime tried to use all
available forces. It is difficult to see why it would have 'killed' men who
had been working the land.
Nevertheless, estimates state that the 100,000 heads of family of the
first category, sent to the Gulag system, had been killed.
But the Party only placed 63,000 kulaks in the first category, and only
those guilty of terrorist and counter-revolutionary acts were executed!
The 100,000 stat was a lie.
Under the NEP, Kulaks and other private producers controlled over half
of the food supply (mainly wheat). The Kulaks didn't cooperate with the
state. The Kulaks even raised prices.
Therefore, Kulaks were responsible for the Holodomor. However, the deaths
of it are *exaggerated* and blamed on Stalin by Stalin's opponents. Only a
few thousand actually died, and their deaths were the Kulaks' fault.
Stalin ended the Ukranian famines with his collectivization of the agriculture."
These facts can be independently verified. I am always trying to encourage people to do their own research, and this is an issue that I will entrust you to do just that.
Maoist Revision?
I have noticed one particular trend that Maoism introduced. It was that of Nationalist "communism" (if you would call it that) rather than the internationalist brand suggested by Karl Marx himself.
I have not had time to research it more in depth because I've been swamped with other research issues.
I would be interested to find out if it was ultimately a brand of National Socialist for China.
Those who would point out what modern China is doing neglect to acknowledge that modern China has drifted from Mao's ideas quite a bit.
It would be very interesting if someone could either confirm or disprove my suspicions. Many other "communist" nations that I have examined turned out to be much more Nationalist than communism could ever be.
I will cover these in a later article.
I have not had time to research it more in depth because I've been swamped with other research issues.
I would be interested to find out if it was ultimately a brand of National Socialist for China.
Those who would point out what modern China is doing neglect to acknowledge that modern China has drifted from Mao's ideas quite a bit.
It would be very interesting if someone could either confirm or disprove my suspicions. Many other "communist" nations that I have examined turned out to be much more Nationalist than communism could ever be.
I will cover these in a later article.
Funny Picture from Stalin's Days
(retrieved from cache)
This image is from a former Soviet newspaper called Pravda. It followed the exile of the Jew, Leon Trotsky, from Russia (who was later ordered to be killed by Stalin in Mexico).
According to some sources, this was a moment of uprising in criticism of Jews at the time.
It is true that Stalin publicly said that Anti-Semitism was a crime in Soviet Russia. However, multiple people reported private statements from him that were hugely Anti Jew.
The numerous purges of Jews in Russia under Stalin should be a testament to this fact.
Stalin tried to rid the last bit of power from the Jews, but died before being able to do so.
May we continue Stalin's fight against the Jew demons.
This image is from a former Soviet newspaper called Pravda. It followed the exile of the Jew, Leon Trotsky, from Russia (who was later ordered to be killed by Stalin in Mexico).
According to some sources, this was a moment of uprising in criticism of Jews at the time.
It is true that Stalin publicly said that Anti-Semitism was a crime in Soviet Russia. However, multiple people reported private statements from him that were hugely Anti Jew.
The numerous purges of Jews in Russia under Stalin should be a testament to this fact.
Stalin tried to rid the last bit of power from the Jews, but died before being able to do so.
May we continue Stalin's fight against the Jew demons.
Hitler Was Not on the Far Right
(retrieved from cache)
I would like any evidence that Hitler was on the far right of the political scale.
As National SOCIALISTS we are not for decentralized government. We want a strongly centralized government that is truly unified.
This is not to say that the modern Leftist movement is correct by any means.
We do not support the modern trends taking place in our society. My point is that the Left is a REVOLUTIONARY society. It never wants to stay stuck in one particular point in time.
This idea can be used for the good, for the okay, and for the bad.
National Socialist Germany DID want free Healthcare for its citizens. This wasn't to screw them over like our government wants to.
This isn't a game of taking the exact opposite position on everything that the current government is doing. Sometimes it is taking some of the same positions, but using them for the good.
For example, evolution is a fact. That is a position. The current World Order takes that position to use it against people by creating new strands of viruses.
We could use that same position to an end that would help people.
Gentile power and unity!
I would like any evidence that Hitler was on the far right of the political scale.
As National SOCIALISTS we are not for decentralized government. We want a strongly centralized government that is truly unified.
This is not to say that the modern Leftist movement is correct by any means.
We do not support the modern trends taking place in our society. My point is that the Left is a REVOLUTIONARY society. It never wants to stay stuck in one particular point in time.
This idea can be used for the good, for the okay, and for the bad.
National Socialist Germany DID want free Healthcare for its citizens. This wasn't to screw them over like our government wants to.
This isn't a game of taking the exact opposite position on everything that the current government is doing. Sometimes it is taking some of the same positions, but using them for the good.
For example, evolution is a fact. That is a position. The current World Order takes that position to use it against people by creating new strands of viruses.
We could use that same position to an end that would help people.
Gentile power and unity!
The Soviet Union wasn't "against Nazis"
The following video will show you the truth about the issue. Although the comrade who made this video has some obvious racial agenda due to the video description, I will credit this to him since he obviously spent the time to research it.
Polish Your Language Comrade
(retrieved from cache)
What we say in private is indeed our business and no one else needs to butt in. They do have the ability to not associate with you, after all.
However, we are in an era that presentation is key.
We have many that shout curse words all over their radio shows. From time to time, I've been guilty of the same thing.
I am willing to step up and use more eloquent language to use logic to bring people over to our side. Are you willing to do the same?
What would Hitler say to you if he saw you representing him in such a manner? He only used curse words in private, and NEVER used them in front of ladies.
National Socialism has no place for those who can't admit when they've done wrong. I've admitted my mistake in the matter, and I ask that you do the same.
Today these curse words are plastered, with the other garbage, all over television.
Ad Hominem attacks also have no place in trying to encourage other gentiles to the truth.
Imagine yourself trying to calmly explain the fundamentals of National Socialism with nothing but logic, then a troll comes along and only tries to call you names rather than addressing your points. We must avoid doing the same thing to them. If they have legitimate questions or concerns, try your best to answer them. If they are there to cause trouble from the start, they will probably never be convinced. It is best to leave the conversation at that point.
Must the noble gentiles fall in the trappings of sickly language?
Indeed, we must at least try to refrain from such a thing.
When an idea is shared in a pure manner, it will oft times be made manifest to the outside world in a way that it beyond remarkable.
Most of the time this will not be the case. However, we could increase the small number of people coming in by quite a bit if we present ourselves professionally.
Shouting "Sieg Heil!" (which by the way is not English!) in the streets is not a way to bring people over.
Try actually sharing with people what our actual positions are.
May this movement shine forth in the glory of the rising sun which gives its light that all may live.
What we say in private is indeed our business and no one else needs to butt in. They do have the ability to not associate with you, after all.
However, we are in an era that presentation is key.
We have many that shout curse words all over their radio shows. From time to time, I've been guilty of the same thing.
I am willing to step up and use more eloquent language to use logic to bring people over to our side. Are you willing to do the same?
What would Hitler say to you if he saw you representing him in such a manner? He only used curse words in private, and NEVER used them in front of ladies.
National Socialism has no place for those who can't admit when they've done wrong. I've admitted my mistake in the matter, and I ask that you do the same.
Today these curse words are plastered, with the other garbage, all over television.
Ad Hominem attacks also have no place in trying to encourage other gentiles to the truth.
Imagine yourself trying to calmly explain the fundamentals of National Socialism with nothing but logic, then a troll comes along and only tries to call you names rather than addressing your points. We must avoid doing the same thing to them. If they have legitimate questions or concerns, try your best to answer them. If they are there to cause trouble from the start, they will probably never be convinced. It is best to leave the conversation at that point.
Must the noble gentiles fall in the trappings of sickly language?
Indeed, we must at least try to refrain from such a thing.
When an idea is shared in a pure manner, it will oft times be made manifest to the outside world in a way that it beyond remarkable.
Most of the time this will not be the case. However, we could increase the small number of people coming in by quite a bit if we present ourselves professionally.
Shouting "Sieg Heil!" (which by the way is not English!) in the streets is not a way to bring people over.
Try actually sharing with people what our actual positions are.
May this movement shine forth in the glory of the rising sun which gives its light that all may live.
From What Ideology Will the Fourth Reich Arise?
(Recovered after deleted by hacker by copying it from a cache)
I have often heard vain babbling based on nothing but speculation, concerning this topic. Many who will call themselves National Socialists will wish for a reinstitution of Heinrich Himmler’s occult ideology. Even worse, I see many calling for the reinstitution of his racial ideology.
In the end, did either even have a place in the mind of Adolf Hitler? As far as the view on religion is concerned, I believe that the following should at least be enough to get people to think:
I do not support all of the views of the individual who created the video, but the video itself is without flaw concerning the issue.
The racial ideology is something which I find even more puzzling to see modern “Neo-Nazis” partake in. They are indeed just that NEO-Nazis. It is apparent that they are revisionists as far as the ideology of actual socialism is concerned. When one realizes that it was not Hitler himself who was mainly to blame for such a thing, it challenges an entire portion of what you have been told about the man.
Perhaps the following will be enough to get you to think on the issue:
Still the question, “What if anything will compose the Fourth Reich?”, presents itself as a difficulty. Sure we have lightly touched the issue concerning Hitler’s view on religion, and race. However, we have not touched the features of the State or the economic system.
Hitler and Stalin both agreed, placing industry under the control of the State was essential. One could pick at this all day long and state that there was still private ownership of such things in Germany. Ultimately, one question needs to be asked. Was there private CONTROL over the industries in Germany? The answer to anyone who is educated concerning the matter will be an obvious “No”. The amount of goods produced and when was determined by the State. Also, the amount of money obtained by the “owners” of the industries was determined by the State.
To any honest individual, it is a weak argument at best to state that there was private ownership of these things within the Third Reich.
What then is the difference between Marxist Socialism and National Socialism?
Karl Marx described an international system, while National Socialism was Nationalist! Who would have thought that the name actually means what it says? Anyone who wishes to state that classes would have remained should skip to 2:50 in the following, and see what Hitler said for yourself:
There are many other speeches in which he spoke of there being a future of no classes within society. This does not exactly mean that everyone would have equal power. However, all would be viewed equal as far as opportunity is concerned. All would have the same rights to Health-care, a reasonable wage to support their family, and so on and so forth.
While Mussolini’s Nationalism was good, his economic system was left lacking. It was the last line of corrupt Capitalism taking its root in Italy. Comparing Hitlerism to Fascism is a Neo-Liberal tactic, so that he can be distanced from the Left portion of the political spectrum.
We are not proclaiming an Internationalism. We are however proclaiming a Socialism within one country. This was the same system that Stalin and Mao had in mind. It is also the same that the DPRK (North Korea) has in place currently. When you see Nationalism promoted in a system being called Socialist, it is generally a good indicator that the system is genuine. We have seen how these countries in the past have lashed out against the Jew World Order, and supported heartfelt Nationalism for their country. They stressed independence for their country as far as is possible.
Rather than bankrupting ourselves by giving the rights of this system to illegal immigrants, and seeking to be absorbed into an international community, we want the benefits of the system to belong to citizens of the country alone. No racial exclusion will be involved. What will be involved is National/Cultural exclusion.
Oh, only if the National Bolshevik party currently in Russia would give up its racial views! They would be spot on with our points. If only people would realize that the same system was promoted by Hitler, Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Mao, Pol Pot, and many others! Maybe then we would have common sense used in which type of system should be utilized.
It is unfathomable to see mindless Christians and Odinists act like they follow the lead of Adolf the Great. As was seen in the video earlier, he neither supported Christianity or a return to the worship of Wotan (Odin). I will grant that we should not force people to give up the beliefs that they have. Judaism, however, will not be tolerated either in its esoteric or exoteric forms by the State. What I mean by that is that we will not support it being practiced spiritually, or in its economic/political form in the State. We have seen how it corrodes society too many times. It will not be tolerated in the Fourth Reich for any reason.
Nothing that seeks to undermine the power of the State will be allowed. Such things will be stomped underneath our boots. It is worth saying that Christianity will die a natural death one day. After science has disproven all points of Christianity, it will be done away with by default. People will no longer see it to be useful.
The Staate will always remain secular. There will be no tinge of spirituality that runs the affairs of the State. The Odinists, JOSers and many others will disagree. We are not interested in these racialist groups anyway. Such will be done away with by the Nationalist Socialist revolution in America.
This is a call to all to study the writings of Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, Adolf Hitler, Mao, and the others. This is a call to those who will support our cause to step up. I know that our numbers do not appear too pleasing to the eye. Remember that each revolutionary movement in the past started with only a few members. It then swelled into a giant that could not be put to sleep during the time.
Will you be a true revolutionary, or an armchair rebel?
I have often heard vain babbling based on nothing but speculation, concerning this topic. Many who will call themselves National Socialists will wish for a reinstitution of Heinrich Himmler’s occult ideology. Even worse, I see many calling for the reinstitution of his racial ideology.
In the end, did either even have a place in the mind of Adolf Hitler? As far as the view on religion is concerned, I believe that the following should at least be enough to get people to think:
I do not support all of the views of the individual who created the video, but the video itself is without flaw concerning the issue.
The racial ideology is something which I find even more puzzling to see modern “Neo-Nazis” partake in. They are indeed just that NEO-Nazis. It is apparent that they are revisionists as far as the ideology of actual socialism is concerned. When one realizes that it was not Hitler himself who was mainly to blame for such a thing, it challenges an entire portion of what you have been told about the man.
Perhaps the following will be enough to get you to think on the issue:
Still the question, “What if anything will compose the Fourth Reich?”, presents itself as a difficulty. Sure we have lightly touched the issue concerning Hitler’s view on religion, and race. However, we have not touched the features of the State or the economic system.
Hitler and Stalin both agreed, placing industry under the control of the State was essential. One could pick at this all day long and state that there was still private ownership of such things in Germany. Ultimately, one question needs to be asked. Was there private CONTROL over the industries in Germany? The answer to anyone who is educated concerning the matter will be an obvious “No”. The amount of goods produced and when was determined by the State. Also, the amount of money obtained by the “owners” of the industries was determined by the State.
To any honest individual, it is a weak argument at best to state that there was private ownership of these things within the Third Reich.
What then is the difference between Marxist Socialism and National Socialism?
Karl Marx described an international system, while National Socialism was Nationalist! Who would have thought that the name actually means what it says? Anyone who wishes to state that classes would have remained should skip to 2:50 in the following, and see what Hitler said for yourself:
There are many other speeches in which he spoke of there being a future of no classes within society. This does not exactly mean that everyone would have equal power. However, all would be viewed equal as far as opportunity is concerned. All would have the same rights to Health-care, a reasonable wage to support their family, and so on and so forth.
While Mussolini’s Nationalism was good, his economic system was left lacking. It was the last line of corrupt Capitalism taking its root in Italy. Comparing Hitlerism to Fascism is a Neo-Liberal tactic, so that he can be distanced from the Left portion of the political spectrum.
We are not proclaiming an Internationalism. We are however proclaiming a Socialism within one country. This was the same system that Stalin and Mao had in mind. It is also the same that the DPRK (North Korea) has in place currently. When you see Nationalism promoted in a system being called Socialist, it is generally a good indicator that the system is genuine. We have seen how these countries in the past have lashed out against the Jew World Order, and supported heartfelt Nationalism for their country. They stressed independence for their country as far as is possible.
Rather than bankrupting ourselves by giving the rights of this system to illegal immigrants, and seeking to be absorbed into an international community, we want the benefits of the system to belong to citizens of the country alone. No racial exclusion will be involved. What will be involved is National/Cultural exclusion.
Oh, only if the National Bolshevik party currently in Russia would give up its racial views! They would be spot on with our points. If only people would realize that the same system was promoted by Hitler, Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Mao, Pol Pot, and many others! Maybe then we would have common sense used in which type of system should be utilized.
It is unfathomable to see mindless Christians and Odinists act like they follow the lead of Adolf the Great. As was seen in the video earlier, he neither supported Christianity or a return to the worship of Wotan (Odin). I will grant that we should not force people to give up the beliefs that they have. Judaism, however, will not be tolerated either in its esoteric or exoteric forms by the State. What I mean by that is that we will not support it being practiced spiritually, or in its economic/political form in the State. We have seen how it corrodes society too many times. It will not be tolerated in the Fourth Reich for any reason.
Nothing that seeks to undermine the power of the State will be allowed. Such things will be stomped underneath our boots. It is worth saying that Christianity will die a natural death one day. After science has disproven all points of Christianity, it will be done away with by default. People will no longer see it to be useful.
The Staate will always remain secular. There will be no tinge of spirituality that runs the affairs of the State. The Odinists, JOSers and many others will disagree. We are not interested in these racialist groups anyway. Such will be done away with by the Nationalist Socialist revolution in America.
This is a call to all to study the writings of Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, Adolf Hitler, Mao, and the others. This is a call to those who will support our cause to step up. I know that our numbers do not appear too pleasing to the eye. Remember that each revolutionary movement in the past started with only a few members. It then swelled into a giant that could not be put to sleep during the time.
Will you be a true revolutionary, or an armchair rebel?
Hacked by a crazy man
A crazy man who added me on Skype hacked my computer through the program. I was talking to him about my political views, and he had the ability to hack. The man was from Denmark, and had a bone to pick with me. He hacked many of my accounts, including this one. It was not easy to get back into everything, and this reckless behaviour is my fault alone. I should not add just anyone who requests me like I have been doing. I would not be surprised to find my Skype account in the same mess by the time I got back. This inspires me to push harder against all odds. I have not been pushing hard enough, and articles will be put back on here of the same nature. Let us leap into the future regardless of those who tie us down.
Your Comrade Forever,
Michael Hutchinson
Your Comrade Forever,
Michael Hutchinson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)