This may be a question which arises in the head of a visitor from time to time. It is something that I have thought about from time to time.
We are not promoting internationalism in the sense of global governance. Otherwise our title would be an oxymoron. Merely, I am suggesting to the WORLD that they promote the interests of which ever nation they belong to.
It is also good to see what input people have from around the world. In all honesty, I am not sure of how many people visit this blog. I haven't received much contact, so how much of an alliance is this really? Basically I bought shoes bigger than my feet, hoping that my feet would grow. I was hoping that this would become an actual alliance of people around the world. A format for people to promote nationalism of their own country in one place.
Also, friendship of nations is not contrary to the ideal of nationalism. It is just when a group like the UN forms and rids nations of power and sovereignty. We wish to seek friendship around the world. Imperialism is contrary to nationalism. When boarders expand to locations in several parts of the world, an empire forms. This is not a nation. It is a reach for global control, and we have to stand in opposition to this.
It is funny that people wish to replace empires with a global empire. We wish to replace this with solid nations and actual borders. Only this can be the answer to imperialism, and we are not the first to acknowledge this. Whether people wish to realize it or not, nationalism has not had a very solid existence. The tendency toward imperialism has existed almost as long as nations have. We wish to abolish this and move toward a more well-defined nationalism which keeps its hands off of the land of others.
May nationalism arise wherever you may live!
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Marxist Materialism
When people who focus on politics engage with people who mostly focus on science, confusion arises.
Marxist materialism is not the same as the scientific postulation of materialism. Marxism says that every problem in society can be explained by the lack of material goods in that instance. Scientific materialism states that all that exists is matter. While someone can be both, one isn't always coupled with the other. Being the former usually does include the latter. However, the latter doesn't always include the former.
I can be a scientific materialist yet I can see that humans are much more than the material that they can produce as a worker. I could also say that I am only composed of matter, but the sum total of the parts produces something much greater than the parts when not arranged in such a fashion. I don't know if such a thing introduces a new form of materialism or not.
When someone brings up being a materialist, or a discussion on the topic arises, make sure terms are defined before continuing on into the discussion. As National Socialists, we are not materialists in the Marxist sense. There are elements such as culture which play an important part to society and not just the material goods which are available. However, I will not state a stance as far as scientific materialism is concerned. As far as I am concerned, there can be multiple opinions and debate on that issue.
We are only against Marxist materialism as far as this webpage is concerned. Hopefully this was able to get rid of some of the confusion that occasionally arises when bringing up this subject.
Marxist materialism is not the same as the scientific postulation of materialism. Marxism says that every problem in society can be explained by the lack of material goods in that instance. Scientific materialism states that all that exists is matter. While someone can be both, one isn't always coupled with the other. Being the former usually does include the latter. However, the latter doesn't always include the former.
I can be a scientific materialist yet I can see that humans are much more than the material that they can produce as a worker. I could also say that I am only composed of matter, but the sum total of the parts produces something much greater than the parts when not arranged in such a fashion. I don't know if such a thing introduces a new form of materialism or not.
When someone brings up being a materialist, or a discussion on the topic arises, make sure terms are defined before continuing on into the discussion. As National Socialists, we are not materialists in the Marxist sense. There are elements such as culture which play an important part to society and not just the material goods which are available. However, I will not state a stance as far as scientific materialism is concerned. As far as I am concerned, there can be multiple opinions and debate on that issue.
We are only against Marxist materialism as far as this webpage is concerned. Hopefully this was able to get rid of some of the confusion that occasionally arises when bringing up this subject.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)