This is true in both senses of the word. I am left handed, and my political ideology is very left oriented. The reactionary "Neo-Nazis" do not like someone to come out saying that National Socialism was and always will be a left-wing movement. My favorite way that they choose to dance around this is by saying that "National Socialist just means that we are RACIST! Fuck you niggers!!!"
These trash don't deserve to use the name National Socialist, because they do not even have enough sense that it means just what it says. It is Socialism in the context of Nationalism instead of International Socialism (Marxism). This is especially true in the earlier days of the NSDAP when the SA would back the labor unions who were going on strike.
Disinformation was fed to the Hitler by Heinrich Himmler in order to purge the left wing from the party. It was alleged that Ernst Rohm had a plot to assassinate Hitler. The evidence was completely fabricated in order to kill people such as Ernst Rohm and Gregor Strasser. Since Otto Strasser was in exile, he survived the purges. I cannot be happy enough that they were not able to purge him, because out of this came the opportunity for him to write many things.
This is not to trash Adolf Hitler, because some things which he did can be utilized as well. However, to say that he made no mistakes and did not make compromises is a far cry from reality. He truly thought that they were trying to murder him. Whether he should have known better or not is anyone's guess.
If I don't worship Hitler, these drunk scumbags run their mouths constantly. I've been called everything in the book for commending Ernst Rohm in liberating the people by use of the SA (storm troopers). So what if he was a homosexual? What does orientation have to do with our economic policy? While I generally support the family unit, forcing someone into this structure who has no feeling for women would be outright stupidity.
Socialism is what is becoming popular among different workers who are tired of being pushed around. They wish for things to come which will liberate the workers, and they should. People form the right wing generally want to "bring back the constitution". The constitution is what brought us into this mess in the first place. If it were a more solid foundation, this country would not have rotted to the core so suddenly. The right wishes to bring things back to the way they were, rather than implementing what is essential to progress. We need to reach out to the left first and foremost.
If we can promote the same ideas using different wording, then we can win many of them over to our cause. The problem is that the Internationalist Socialists are at the forefront of supporting the causes of the workers. We need to show our support to the workers in order to gain support for our cause in turn. National Socialism is meant to be a liberating tool for the workers, and it should always be used as such.
Hail America!
Friday, August 26, 2011
Capitalism: A Love Story
I have mixed feelings about the film which I just finished watching. It was full of much relevant information about how Wall Street controls society only for a profit motive. The biggest problem which I saw is that an Internationalist type of Socialism was proposed as the solution for these problems.
This is what I mean when I say Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin. Capitalism has a desire to globalize our economy for the benefit of the wealthy. Communism also wants a globalized world where the entire globe comes under the control of one body.
Both systems are proponents (whether in a forthright manner or not.) of a New World Order which involves the dissolving of nation states as we know them. This is the logical conclusion for the profit-based system of Capitalism, whether its proponents are nationalist or not.
Therefore, National Socialism is the only solution. By having socialism within a nationalist and patriotic sense, we put our nation's interests above anyone else's.
Another problem with the film is that it put Obama and Roosevelt in a positive light, when in reality these people were agents for the same bankers which control society today. It appeared that Obama was to be criticized in the film when it showed that Goldman Sachs was his top contributor. It then went into a game suggesting that the bankers tried to buy him off, but it didn't succeed. This was as if Obama stuck to his promises and did not give in to this crowd. These people ignore Obama's bailout which came not too long after he entered office. Not to mention his violation of the liberties of "terrorists" held in Guantanamo Bay.
The credits begin with the Marxist anthem call "the Internationale" which is a communist and globalist song. However, the film is filled with good critiques of capitalism if one knows how to weed out the bad things interlaced with the good stuff.
This is what I mean when I say Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin. Capitalism has a desire to globalize our economy for the benefit of the wealthy. Communism also wants a globalized world where the entire globe comes under the control of one body.
Both systems are proponents (whether in a forthright manner or not.) of a New World Order which involves the dissolving of nation states as we know them. This is the logical conclusion for the profit-based system of Capitalism, whether its proponents are nationalist or not.
Therefore, National Socialism is the only solution. By having socialism within a nationalist and patriotic sense, we put our nation's interests above anyone else's.
Another problem with the film is that it put Obama and Roosevelt in a positive light, when in reality these people were agents for the same bankers which control society today. It appeared that Obama was to be criticized in the film when it showed that Goldman Sachs was his top contributor. It then went into a game suggesting that the bankers tried to buy him off, but it didn't succeed. This was as if Obama stuck to his promises and did not give in to this crowd. These people ignore Obama's bailout which came not too long after he entered office. Not to mention his violation of the liberties of "terrorists" held in Guantanamo Bay.
The credits begin with the Marxist anthem call "the Internationale" which is a communist and globalist song. However, the film is filled with good critiques of capitalism if one knows how to weed out the bad things interlaced with the good stuff.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
National Socialism and Syndicalism
I've wanted to integrate these two ideas together for a while now, because both have shown remarkable success where they have been utilized. I did not know how a certain aspect would be handled until tonight when the answer dawned on me. It was the issue of integrating syndicalism and nationalization of major industries at the same exact time. The answer was obvious, yet I've been thinking too hard.
Quite simply the workers need to make all of the decisions possible at the factory level. The state can periodically send in a representative for that particular industry to suggest changes which had not been thought about by the cooperative. I would like to be informed how Venezuela integrates nationalization and syndicalization at the same time, because they do both of these things. Sadly, not much information is available regarding this (at least in English).
We are champions of the lower and middle classes in that we wish to improve their condition. For the nation as a whole to be healthy, its citizens need to have improved living conditions. By instituting cooperatives, the people have more pride in their work place, because they can become involved in the decision making process.
The nation being top-down and bottom-up at the same time will utilize the best from both worlds to make a significantly improved nation. The Third Position has always been about utilizing what works from both sides, and I wish to continue that into our modern era.
Quite simply the workers need to make all of the decisions possible at the factory level. The state can periodically send in a representative for that particular industry to suggest changes which had not been thought about by the cooperative. I would like to be informed how Venezuela integrates nationalization and syndicalization at the same time, because they do both of these things. Sadly, not much information is available regarding this (at least in English).
We are champions of the lower and middle classes in that we wish to improve their condition. For the nation as a whole to be healthy, its citizens need to have improved living conditions. By instituting cooperatives, the people have more pride in their work place, because they can become involved in the decision making process.
The nation being top-down and bottom-up at the same time will utilize the best from both worlds to make a significantly improved nation. The Third Position has always been about utilizing what works from both sides, and I wish to continue that into our modern era.
Monday, August 15, 2011
Back After Long Break
I'm back after a long break and a lot of consideration on core issues. I still maintain the idea of a multi-racial National Socialist ideology with some left wing components. Someone trapped me on the idea of incorporating monarchy into the idea until I realized the stupidity of what I was falling into. National Socialism never had the idea of a hereditary empire. This is obvious due to the fact that Hitler had no plans to have any kids, and that the list of successors were not even partially related to him.
What has changed is that I see National Socialism to not just be leftist. Thenwhole point was to take elements from both the left and right to compose an ideology which was "beyond left and right". We take Nationalism from the right and Socialism from the left, which forms out Nationalist Socialism.
I am open to integrating various ideas from different 3rd position groups in order to make the best type of society possible. The integration of National Syndicalism appears very favorable in order to give workers more control over their work place. The state would intervene when decisions could not be made by the syndicalist union. This would only apply to factory and large scale work places. Local businesses would remain virtually untouched because they are too small to need a large group of organization. A sort of free market would be left in tact, whereas in communism this would not take place.
Hitler was tricked into thinking that the more leftist side of the party (Ernst Rohm, the Strasser brothers, etc) was out to kill him, and this led to their execution. Years later Hitler admitted that such was a mistake. We stand behind these early leftists because without them the party would never have been nearly as successful. They were behind a lot of the early organization and battles which had to take place to gain such noteriety. We know you are in Valhalla, Mr. Rohm and the Strasser brothers. Thank you for National Socialism, and hopefully you guys and the Fuhrer have come to an understanding on the other side.
They surely march in spirit with us and urge us on in America to gain the National Socialist state.
Heil America!
Michael Hutchinson
What has changed is that I see National Socialism to not just be leftist. Thenwhole point was to take elements from both the left and right to compose an ideology which was "beyond left and right". We take Nationalism from the right and Socialism from the left, which forms out Nationalist Socialism.
I am open to integrating various ideas from different 3rd position groups in order to make the best type of society possible. The integration of National Syndicalism appears very favorable in order to give workers more control over their work place. The state would intervene when decisions could not be made by the syndicalist union. This would only apply to factory and large scale work places. Local businesses would remain virtually untouched because they are too small to need a large group of organization. A sort of free market would be left in tact, whereas in communism this would not take place.
Hitler was tricked into thinking that the more leftist side of the party (Ernst Rohm, the Strasser brothers, etc) was out to kill him, and this led to their execution. Years later Hitler admitted that such was a mistake. We stand behind these early leftists because without them the party would never have been nearly as successful. They were behind a lot of the early organization and battles which had to take place to gain such noteriety. We know you are in Valhalla, Mr. Rohm and the Strasser brothers. Thank you for National Socialism, and hopefully you guys and the Fuhrer have come to an understanding on the other side.
They surely march in spirit with us and urge us on in America to gain the National Socialist state.
Heil America!
Michael Hutchinson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)